1.5 Evidence and Witch-hunts

The whole process of witch-hunts hinges around how is dealt with facts and evidence derived from them.

  1. 1. Somebody behaves in an unpleasant or cultural unacceptable but otherwise harmless way.

  2. 2. People irritated or distressed by this and feeling powerless to change it, tend to select especially those negative cues that can be lumped together in a negative way. Contradicting positive interpretations are filtered out. Believes played a crucial role in this often arbitrarily linking of 'facts'.
  3. The "You are with us, or else…" dimension.
    In order to maintain the moral hegemony, there is the clear-cut simple world of each other excluding parts. God and the Devil, good and evil, "We the righteous people" and "them the evil, damned people". If you don't agree with their values, their beliefs, their perceptions, you are out. Challenging them on any of these has the same dire "Who is not with us, is against us." consequences. Defending a suspect has become dangerous. In modern times the least what can be expected is exclusion of the circle of witch hunters.

  4. Once a person was suspected of being a witch, the witch-hunters focus was on getting her sentenced. Everything a suspect expressed became automatically proof of their guilt. A mentioning de-charging fact was seen as attempts to mislead the courts, and was again a proof. When other people supported her in their protests, they were at risk to be seen as betrayers of the Truth.


Previous Section Top of the article Next Section